Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalypso (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Kalypso (software)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod; this article is about a subject which does not appear to meet the notability criteria. Alas, my poor knowledge regarding software and poorer German makes me feel that AfD is more appropriate than nominating it for speedy deletion myself. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete fails to establish notability. ninety:one 23:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  StarM  22:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The Kalypso framework is used in an european wide project for flood damage prevention established by the European Union (see Interreg II link link). There are not that much open source applications on the field of hydraulic computation and GIS processing available. If someone wants to have informations of hydraulic open source software he can find a description and additional links over the wikipedia pages. Normally all this hydraulic software costs a lot of money. So the fact that this software is avalable as open source is a notable reason (from my point of view). User:Tschang 11:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC) — Tschang (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep looks like the first of its kind. It needs to be categorized but dont know where.--Cs california (talk) 04:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.