Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kama Chinen (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of Japanese supercentenarians. Tone 17:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Kama Chinen
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent notability besides her exceptional longevity. This person's entry in the list of Japanese supercentenarians is enough, per WP:NOPAGE. I performed a redirect on 8 November but it was reverted on 11 November, thus I'm seeking consensus to re-instate the redirect. Many similar articles about non-notable people who lived over 110 years were recently merged or deleted. — JFG talk 04:02, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable oldster.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:16, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete This article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO1E because there is only sparse WP:ROUTINE coverage of her that fails to demonstrate notability and there is no notability guideline that "the oldest x" is notable. The content of the article is pretty much just trivia on how she relates to other peoples longevity milestones or longevity milestones for various jurisdictions. She lived. She avoided the Reaper longer then most. She died. Classic case of WP:NOPAGE. Given this individuals apparent obscurity, I think heavy weight should be given to her and her family's desire for anonymity as well. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.