Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamaal Rashid Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) FITINDIA&#160;(talk) 16:47, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Kamaal Rashid Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not at all notable. Became popular due to the controversial statements on Twitter and other social media. Completely fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:ARTIST. KC Velaga ☚╣✉╠☛  15:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 20:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject does not meet general notability guidelines. Meatsgains (talk) 02:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Check out the sources I posted below. North America1000 06:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – He has received significant coverage in independent reliable sources, so is eligible for a stand-alone article as per WP:GNG. -   Managerarc   ™ talk  20:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's still nothing actually particularly convincing, the article has several sources and information with it, but still nothing actually convincing, his list of works is certainly not convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  18:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment to closer – check out WP:NEXIST. North America1000 06:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

 References
 * Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC, and has received coverage about other matters than his online presence, so WP:BLP1E does not apply. Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. North America1000 22:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The Times of India
 * India Today
 * The Indian Express
 * Daily News and Analysis
 * The Times of India
 * Mid-Day
 * Keep. Received independent coverage and meets BASIC. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  02:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.