Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamael


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Lineage II. While strict !vote !counting might show no consensus (2 keep, 2 merge, 2 delete), 4 of the 6 opinions mentioned merge/redirect as an option, including 1 of the deletes. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  23:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Kamael

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not particularly notable, doesn't appear to meet any of WP:N. Ged UK (talk) 12:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Lineage II. MuZemike (talk) 22:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as this race/character is not notable enough to have an article of its own. Does not meet the WP:GNG of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Randomran (talk) 01:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge Immediately Just bring this information to the main article. Also I agree with everyone above me. -71.190.180.67 (talk) 02:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge and redirect without deletion as article is really new and so I suggest Don't demolish the house while it's still being built and Give an article a chance. Beyond that it seems notable and verifiable and so I think we can keep in some manner per Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world). Sincerely, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 05:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as the article needs a chance to grow. Caliah (talk) 04:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and rd to Lineage II. Eusebeus (talk) 15:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.