Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamakuza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 12:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Kamakuza

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Dicdef which for some reason has survived two years. Not a hoax — 500+ Ghits excluding mirrors - but I can't see any reason for it to stay on Wikipedia. It was transwikied two years ago with the comment "the second paragraph looks encyclopedic enough", but I can't see it myself; however, since User:Zzyzx11 obviously did see it, bringing it over for discussion instead of prodding. -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  19:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Uncited dicdef of a neologism. Already transwikied. Caknuck 19:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.   -- Grutness...wha?  06:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. I created the article originally, at the time under the impression that another editor I knew here was going to expand it. Unfortunately, she no longer edit on Wikipedia, and I don't have the references for the original. I'd argue with Caknuck's comment about it being a neologism, though - it's about 25 years old and is widely used as pointed out in iridescenti's nomination. Wiktionary is probably the better place for it, though. Grutness...wha?  06:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.