Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kambiz Alavian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 19:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Kambiz Alavian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Vanity article, no indication of notability. Even google search doesn't offers any significant result for subject to be included as an encyclopedic subject. Ireneshih (talk) 06:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: On the contrary, Google Scholar search suggests he is a well known neuroscientist with a significant amount of papers, among which he and his co-workers found that "..Bcl-xL regulates metabolic efficiency of neurons through interaction with the mitochondrial F1FO ATP synthase", as stated in the article. --BiH (talk) 12:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. WoS h-index of 10 in a very highly cited field. Will likely be notable in future, but WP:TOOSOON for now. Agricola44 (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:29, 8 July 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete. The young researcher award is not enough, and (per Xxanthippe) the academic impact he has demonstrated through citations to his work is also not yet enough. What else is there? —David Eppstein (talk) 07:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.