Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Sabaki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Wal ton  Need some help?  19:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Kamen Rider Sabaki

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable fictional characters, most don't assert notability even with regards to the show itself. (In fact, some of these "articles" are in such poor shape that it took me a while to figure out that they were, indeed, fictional). No assertion of real world context, hence they are merely plot summaries and possibly original research. Completely unsourced. Contested prod. MER-C 05:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep You won't find me watching it, but Kamen Rider is a notable-enough show that its main group of characters should have articles. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep All of the characters are individual characters within Kamen Rider Hibiki. They may not be the primary characters (Hibiki, Ibuki, Zanki, Todoroki) but they are still characters in the series that had an impact on the series as a whole.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 22:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong merge all to Other Oni Kamen Rider. Then we need to fix the title of that article. At the very least, something should be done about Kamen Rider Shōki ("Only seen once in the TV series.") and Kamen Rider Eiki ("He is only seen in episodes 28 and 29."). These are characters who appeared in a few episodes of the fourteenth spinoff series of this franchise, which is over – in other words, these are permastubs. There will never, ever be "non-trivial published works that are reliable and independent of the subject" about these characters. I see no evidence of notability here. Dekimasu よ! 09:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't really call it a spinoff, but, you're right about how these will never really be as massive as the other Hibiki articles— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 17:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I guess I would agree. I can go ahead and merge them and fix up the page. Yaguruma 23:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.