Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamla Nath Sharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Kamla Nath Sharma

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Present coverage is not enough for WP:GNG and BLP does not meet WP:NBIO. Possible promotion on subject's request. Devan Lallu (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 *  Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Devan Lallu (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 *  Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Devan Lallu (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 *  Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Devan Lallu (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Devan Lallu (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Devan Lallu (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as per nom: The current sources are not enough to establish GNG. Results from WP:Before was also a disappointment as nothing useful were found. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 13:52, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The nom is a blocked sockpuppet of, see Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix man/Archive. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 12:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 11:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 11:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 11:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)


 * delete fails to demonstrated notability, fails WP:NPROF. It seems his only work was a single book with 53 citations and his MA does not look any better. The awards he got are all non-notable but I am not sure about these "citation plaques" he got but looking at the 58th IEC Meeting reports, they also give them for best paper awards and other things "3.9 Best Paper Award 2007 The award is a citation plaque along with a cash prize of either £ 250, or £ 400 – in the form of Gift Books (Wiley Publications), and the awardee will have an option to choose." which does not seem to make it notable. --hroest 14:46, 25 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Zero evidence of meeting NPROF, and GNG profile is decidedly lacking. JoelleJay (talk) 01:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.