Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamora


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Kamora

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable, unreferenced poor quality article Little Professor (talk) 23:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Strongest possible keep - One of the most notable of its genre (coffee liqueurs). Let's work together to make this the best possible encyclopedia, improving this article rather than deleting it, since it does meet our notability criteria. Badagnani (talk) 01:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment This AfD doesn't appear to be listed correctly and isn't showing up on the article. Also, while there are other returns for Kamora, I am finding numerous related to the coffee liquer covered in this article, so it seems to be quite a notable subject. I could maybe see an argument for a merge somewhere, but it's not clear to me how deleting the subject entirely would improve Wikipedia. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:46, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 *  Comment Keep sounds yummy - I was musing on a merge to a page on coffee liqueur, but there is only a list of liqueurs, so there is no target for a merge. I will have a look online for sources but am veering to keep. this looks promising but wading through commercial websites on google searches is frustrating. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have finished listing this article properly as well as tagging the article itself. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:44, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Loads of reliable sources available from books and new articles Phil Bridger (talk) 20:06, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - easily sourced. This AfD is not a proper forum to debate the quality of articles. The nominator should have brought his concerns up on the talk page. --Jeremy (blah blah) 07:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - minimal effort indicated notability. Yes the article is in DIRE need of improvement, but it does not belong at AFD. Being a stub is not a deletable criterion. Manning (talk) 02:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.