Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kampung Pintu Padang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nomination was flawed and as such the 'per nom' !vote does also. In fact, the nomination almost falls under WP:SKCRIT #4, as the subject clearly passes WP:GEOLAND with no other policy-basis for deltion. "No source" was claimed- erroneously, as I have added a couple,(no WP:BEFORE had obviously been done); also "no notability" was claimed, but this as we have seen is refuted by the place's status as being legally recognised, as pointed put by User:Doncram. (non-admin closure)  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 14:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Kampung Pintu Padang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No source and notability.  angys (Talk Talk) 08:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom.-- HindWikiConnect 09:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 11:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 11:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: It is a populated place, and its existence is not disputed.  Don't we keep all such cases? --Doncram (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ! dave  09:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.