Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamz Inkzone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Kamz Inkzone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

paid for article sourced entirely to fake media outlets and press releases. Praxidicae (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Sadly, The Statesman (India), founded in 1875 and the The Times of India, founded in 1838, both supposed to be respectable, long-standing newspapers, have become a publishing platform for paid-for content. I have no idea what possesses them to publish these trifles. Anyway, the times doesn't even mention the subject. The Free Press Journal appears to have withdrawn the cited article. The Asian Age, at the bottom of the article says: (Asian Age doesn't endorse the above content.) Vexations (talk) 14:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable tatoo artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG - no major awards, no accomplishments, really. Sorry. Bearian (talk) 02:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.