Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanchan Gupta (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Kanchan Gupta
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly cited article with multiple claims failed to me Wikipedia's criteria verifiability in addition to that the subject also failed to meet WP:BIO. In the previous AfD the result of the discussion was keep yet it was not properly established whether the subject is really notable. —  San ska ri  Hangout 12:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 12:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 12:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 12:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 12:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep – More than meets Notability guidelines. Referenced anD quoted in the Outlook India, Washington Post and Times of India to just name a few and shown here . ShoesssS Talk 13:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Generally the sources are the articles that he wrote himself and others who have referred him are reliable. My Lord (talk) 11:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Winged Blades Godric  07:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * The only two independent reliable third party sources are merely passing mentions of him...Delete (Discounting all sources written by him or which could have been influenced by him....) — FR&thinsp;+ 11:33, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 09:55, 19 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.