Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kang Se Jung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 20:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Kang Se Jung
This can be read in conjunction with the AfD nomination for the article Papaya (group). NN person who does not meet criteria of WP:BIO. No sources or verification provided. Main portion of article appears to be a copyvio of this. Everything beyond that part of the article is generic material not specific to this biography. The only external link (source?) is to a non-english language website. Agent 86 18:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * keep Not a copyvio.... Main sources are the Trifecta profile and empas profile. She's singer turned model and currently listed in Trifecta homepage. I'm not fluent in Korean, but even I did understand what the Trifecta page said using simple lookup in Hangul transliteration guides and Babelfish. Monni 19:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: It appears that this article also does not comply with Reliable sources. Agent 86 19:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Empas is not a reliable source?  I would have thought it falls under more or less the same rubric as anonymous tertiary sources like Encarta, which are specifically permitted under that policy guideline ... see WP:RS.  -- Visviva 01:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * delete - She's not really that famous and the article doesn't have actual content. mirageinred 21:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge with Papaya (group), until there is more information available about her. There doesn't seem to be enough reliable stuff online information to build a proper article.  Oh, and I know many K-pop enthusiasts disagree, but I don't think "blood type" is encyclopedic. -- Visviva 01:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Peta 06:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.