Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kangaroo Jack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. It's snowing Mgm|(talk) 11:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Kangaroo Jack

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Doesn't appear to meet either WP:GNG or the specific WP:NF guideline. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs 02:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Rotten Tomatoes counts 110 reviews, many from nationally and internationally known critics. This passes criterion 1 of WP:NF easily. How can an international film that pulls $88 million at the box office not be notable? --Mkativerata (talk) 04:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep When it premiered, it was the #1 box office draw in the US . Plenty of other sources are available. Just click on the "News" link above your deletion rationale. Zagalejo^^^ 05:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per above. The film was #1 at the box office on its opening weekend, grossing $16 million. That and the fact that the first sentence lists a major studio, famous producer, and notable actors, which one might think would be a hint that maybe the film is notable, leads me to wonder whether the nominator even read the article.--Michael WhiteT&middot;C 05:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep The movie was absolutely awful, but was widely advertised and had millions of viewers. Endorse Michael White's comment directly above mine. The Wordsmith Communicate 08:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep One of actors in this movie is probably the one nominating this page for deletion. Film easier passes WP:NF with flying colors-- Coasttocoast (talk) 08:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Easily meets all film guidelines and even spawned a DVD cartoon sequel. I think the troutslap is well deserved here; a major studio, a #1 film, and a film with name actors in it is always notable, no matter how bad it is (or even if it doesn't even make enough to cover the film canister shipping, like Transylmania did this weekend).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 10:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.