Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kangas, Steve

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:21, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Kangas, Steve
Is this person notable? I certainly can't tell, from the state of this. The article is named in an incorrect format, too. &middot; Katefan0(scribble) 19:59, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but needs work -- there certainly seems to be enough interest out there. Ben-w
 * 4930 google hits for his name as a phrase. No vote, but what's there is borderline-libelous. It should be removed unless there's a rewrite. Meelar (talk) 23:28, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability not established. Radiant_* 08:58, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete maybe Yuckfoo 16:37, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)`
 * Delete --nixie 04:19, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is worthless.  If he is notable and a good article is written on this subject it would be easier to start from scratch. The article is mistitled in any case. Quale 05:42, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I wouldn't say it was borderline libelous, it is libelous. There seems to be a few web-pages out there devoted to him. I can't decide, but it does need to be rewritten if it's kept.
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.