Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kangleipak Historical And Cultural Research Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 17:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Kangleipak Historical And Cultural Research Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of WP:notability. noq (talk) 10:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 10:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 10:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 10:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination, and I was just in the middle of bundling it with Articles for deletion/Wangkhemcha Chingtamlen. I can't find significant coverage of the centre online in reliable sources per WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Captain Calm (talk) 10:21, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication of significance of this organization. Does not pass NCORP.--Mvqr (talk) 11:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete due to subject lacking multiple in-depth reliable sources about it and therefore failing to pass NCORP or the GNG. Adamant1 (talk) 12:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't delete this organisation is active and its work is a gift to revival of script of Indian language Manipuri officially known as Meetei Mayek..here is the proof that the work of this organisation is used at educational level . these arcticle even give reference to the work of Kangleipak Historical And Cultural Research CentreLuwanglinux (talk) 12:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - none of the sources provided on the talk page or in the article show WP:GNG. Those that do show good coverage are not independent as they are written by Wangkhemcha Chingtamlen Spiderone  15:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Check if this can be considered as secondary source. Luwanglinux (talk) 09:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * What for? It does not mention the centre so cannot be used to establish notability of the centre. noq (talk) 10:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * noq (talk) yes there are less article and journal about the centre since it is a non govt self funded private research centre.well shall I wait till such journals or articles(can be considred secondary) are published and can be found in the internet.But I am showing you the influence of the works of the centre so far in promoting official Indian language Meetei Mayek and digging Manipur history and culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luwanglinux (talk • contribs) 12:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately (or not depending) "the influence of the works of the centre so far in promoting official Indian language" isn't a Wikipedia notability criteria. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:25, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Not covered in any major sources in any depth and the creator of the page has displayed serious competency and POV issues at multiple articles. Gotitbro (talk) 10:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


 * @Gotitbro (talk If if it does not meet wikipedia criteria its automatic to be delated.I have no problem with that but you attacking me personally regarding creation of an article seems little childish.Luwanglinux (talk) 11:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Please don't liberally put serious accusations such as WP:PERSONALATTACKS on people, I have only pointed out issues with your edits which clearly permeate into this article. Gotitbro (talk) 11:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:N. Yoonadue (talk) 13:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.