Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kani Kusruti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Kani Kusruti

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional prod removed by editor hence starting the AFD discussion. Page is overtly promotional and is written like an advert. Moreover the person lacks notability. Recommend DELETE Film &#61; Revolution (talk) 10:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Non-notable person. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep agree that inpart the article is too promotional but don't think it is bad enough for TNT, the promo parts can be edited out. There is reliable coverage such as the Hindu here, Manorama here, a short piece in Times of India here, and controversy reported in the Asianet News here, there seems to be enough for WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 02:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep She is a notable person. There are many reliable coverage like Times of India here,The Hindu here, Asianet News here, Deccanchronicle here,Manoramaonline here are these. Page is well written too. there seems to be enough for WP:BASIC Ayyappan CS 15:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayyappancs (talk • contribs)
 * Keep Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 01:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the listed characters are noticeably "woman, "singer", "guest", "wife" and "housekeeper" and those are the ones aside from the unnamed characters; that itself is not what establishes notability and the listed links are still nothing but announcements, mentions and other entertainment casualties, nothing we accept for substance. As it is, Ayyappancs links are shown to be nothing but these same exact sources: Interviews, announcements and mentions, none of that is what satisfies our set established policies. What's worse is the sheer fact we've establishes these such publications are largely paid for publishing such materials by the subjects themselves, hence also unacceptable. We make no compromises because of "She's from another country" or "She's a woman", and we never have established that in policy, and we won't now. I'll allow Drafting if needed, SwisterTwister   talk  02:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.