Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanihama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  04:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Kanihama

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Totally unsourced utterly unencyclopaedic article about a non-notable village in India, letting is know that there's a post office and two ATMs in the village, and then using using the rest of the space to tell us how shawls are made... Thomas.W talk 18:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per editor consensus, there is no such thing as a non-notable village. Confirmed, legally recognized place with ~1,670 people per Census of India, thus passing WP:GEOLAND. • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Blow it up and start over. There's absolutely nothing worth saving in the article, and even if there was the English is so bad it would require a total rewrite. So it's better to delete it, and let someone else start from scatch. Thomas.W talk 21:02, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I suggest simply reverting to a previous, marginally-better version, sans the shawl nonsense. It could then be expanded from there. GABHello! 21:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Obviously, the article needs reworking. But why does it need to be deleted first?  Especially for a short article like this, simply cutting the bad content would accomplish the same goal.  (As an aside, though I haven't found a very good source yet, this village *does* seem to get mentioned for its shawls). Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Howicus and Gene93k. Note any call to "blow it up" indicates the topic is valid. I want to create a bot that finds such arguments and inserts a Keep vote, or. better, closes the AFD. -- do ncr  am  02:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep - passes WP:GEOLAND. Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  16:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a pass of WP:GEOLAND. As for TNTing the article, just be bold and do it yourself. Bringing it to AfD is useless because deletion is not cleanup. SST  flyer  17:04, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.