Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanishk Sajnani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Should future events unfold and sources appear to establish WP:N, this can be created, and the existing text restored for a starting point. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Kanishk Sajnani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appear to be a case of WP:BLP1E, the subject also lacks "significant independent coverage" in reliable sources and therefore fails the general notability guideline. GSS (talk |c|em ) 18:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 18:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Keep The subject may be covered in a Single event but his contributions made to cyber security are quiet notable. Chances are, he'll be back in the news soon. If this article gets deleted, the editor may have to go through the pain of writing the whole thing again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayeshna3194 (talk • contribs) 11:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC) — Ayeshna3194 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: (the creator of this article) and two others are confirmed sockpuppet of  please see Sockpuppet investigations/Sanghvi6722. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 05:52, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete- not seeing an assertion of significance. Even if we grant that, WP:BLP! comes into play. Beyond that, insufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, the article is a hagiography that misrepresents the sources. There's no indication the subject is notable. Huon (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * delete no assertion of significance. does not meet GNG w/ lack of in depth coverage. WP:BLP1E applies,Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.