Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanpei


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Please feel free to create an appropriate redirect in its place. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 03:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Kanpei

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A dab page that consists of one entry that doesn't match (and is listed in its own proper dab page) and a redlinked entry which is not mentioned in its accompanying bluelink. There are a couple of fictional characters (apparently most notably Hayano Kanpei in Chūshingura), but none have their own articles. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:22, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The reason for this redirect is that 寛平 may be read as either Kanpyō or Kanpei (and also Kanbyō, Kanbei). (This info is in the first line of the article.) I have since semi-retired from Wikipedia, but at least previously this type of redirect was desired. Recommend soliciting WP:MOS-JA for comments. Bendono (talk) 05:49, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Then wouldn't it be better to redirect to Kanpyō? Clarityfiend (talk) 07:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * That would be fine with me. Bendono (talk) 08:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment The redlink has a page on the Japanese Wikipedia and an Italian stub . That might be worth looking into.  Funny  Pika! 18:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 09:37, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - This name is more in Japanese usage in reference to Guan Ping rather an obscure Emperor with a reign of only nine years. If there is a redirect, it more properly should go to the son of Guan Yu. However, I see no merit in this dab page and prefer to see it binned. Jun Kayama 03:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.