Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kansas City Wizards Reserve Season 2008


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Kansas City Wizards Reserve Season 2008

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The Kansas City Wizards are obviously notable, but an individual season of the reserve team is not. The Reserve team in gerenal gets very little attention, and not one Googlelisted news article in 2008. Fails WP:NOTE. Fram (talk) 10:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. – PeeJay 10:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 11:34, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete cannot think of any reason for a "junior varsity" team to be notable, even if it is pro.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia does not and should not field information about reserve teams. D ARTH P ANDA duel 14:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Ban  Ray  23:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  09:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No Delete Because it is my baby and what difference does it make to any of you? I have been wondering why our football project hasn't been working on a template for "current season" for our clubs, I guess we're all too busy working about deleting a well maintained reserve article. Morry32 (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. WP:COI? I fail to see how this is notable. D ARTH P ANDA duel 18:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment It isn't really notable I just don't see why we're deleting something that isn't bothering anyone instead of focusing our energy towards real concerns. Morry32 (talk) 19:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as not meeting inclusion criteria. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Dloh  cierekim  00:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable Skitzo (talk) 22:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.