Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanvic Consulting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  A  Train ''talk 08:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Kanvic Consulting

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable consulting firm with little to no actual coverage. All the sources lack depth or are basic listings or one line quotes from the founder, fails WP:GNG. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  10:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your review. Kanvic Consulting is one of the most widely searched consulting firms in Gurgaon and Delhi. And hence people do need to know about its functions and origin. Some of the cites may not provide detailed information about the company, but are still relevant sources and from relevant organizations. If however, some need to be removed, that can be worked on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B.nilasis (talk • contribs) 10:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC) — B.nilasis (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment: If "people do need to know about (a company's) functions and origin", that is a legitimate function of its company website; this is an encyclopaedia not an additional hosting option. Also,, you were previously reminded about WP:DISCLOSE, but I see no response? AllyD (talk) 15:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:04, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:04, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article on a company. The text describes their wares, referenced to brief mentions, media and articles by staff which verify only at a stretch. There is no claim to being more than a company going about its business and my searches are finding nothing better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 15:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  09:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND, topic fails GNG. Also I note from contributions that he has an alternate account and admitted to having created a previous article "Kanvic" which was deleted earlier this month.. This topic should be SALTED to prevent future abuse.  -- HighKing ++ 10:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH as noted. shoy (reactions) 17:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

The article "Kanvic" created was from the same account (not an alternate account) and directly went to speedy deletion. The article "Kanvic Consulting" has been updated to be more in sync with the Wikipedia terms and policies. If there is anything I can do to improve this article, please tell me how instead of just going ahead and deleting it. Thank you.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.