Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanwali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 04:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Kanwali

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:N and WP:V, since it is a little known place and a minor locality of Dehradun. (one of the 100 wards of the Dehradun Municipal Corporation). It can be covered under the Dehradun Municipal Corporation article page. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 16:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 December 28.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 16:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  16:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  16:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. LeBron4 (talk) 16:57, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as long as it can be verified that the place exists, (this one does, based on the refs listed in the article) and has a sizeable population, WP:GEOLAND applies and the article need not be deleted. Anyone is free to summarize content and add to the article of the larger geographical unit. Merging into that is not a reason to delete the individual units. Walrus Ji (talk) 08:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - as a legally recognised populated place, i.e., a ward - see WP:GEOLAND. Also, even though it is now part of a larger populated place, it was apparently formerly a panchayat in its own right, so WP:NOTTEMPORARY applies. Ingratis (talk) 19:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 14:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per arguments by my findings and arguments are the same. Jeepday (talk) 18:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.