Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapalikulangara Sree Mahavishnu Temple


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  18:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Kapalikulangara Sree Mahavishnu Temple

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Opencooper (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep a shortage of English language sources is unfortunate but irrelevant. Curro2 (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * A lack of sources is quite relevant. There is no such guideline saying that sources should be assumed to exist, but on the contrary, our notability guideline says that "notability requires verifiable evidence ... No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: The evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition" If you are aware of non-English sources on the subject, do bring them up. See also: Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Opencooper (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.