Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapil Dua


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Kapil Dua

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page was created & edited by a few linked accounts (including one that was the subject of the article) without ever establishing WP:Notability or declaring WP:COI despite clear bias, and the content remains strictly in violation of WP:Promo JamesG5 (talk) 05:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The content is genuine and fresh, not rewritten. I request you to please have a look or review again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gauravar (talk • contribs) 05:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)  — Gauravar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. —teb728 t c 07:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  13:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  13:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Blatant spam for a hair transplant business, and a M.D. who fails WP:GNG. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.