Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaporo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  10:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Kaporo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Geostub made by who was blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. This one fails WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Please don't just add a GEONAMES entry as a ref; community consensus has consistently been against using such databases to establish legal recognition or GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 18:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 18:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 18:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per nomination, doesn't meet notability requirements. JonnyDKeen (talk) 19:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GEOLAND. – The Grid  ( talk )  21:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Appears to be a genuine, recognised and separate settlement. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom, doesn't meet GNG. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.