Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapu Surnames


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Davewild (talk) 11:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Kapu Surnames

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article consists of nothing but an unlinked list of surnames. This article is not encyclopedic; it’s just an indiscriminant indiscriminate collection of information. It violates WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:IINFO.

I Prod’ed this article two weeks ago, but removed the tag after someone promised on the talk page to improved the article, and add more encyclopedic content. I was skeptical, but tried to give the benefit of the doubt. Since then, nothing has been done except the addition of more names. I’ve left a couple of messages on the talk page, but nothing gets done, so I think it’s time for AfD. barneca (talk) 13:25, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Barneca makes a persuasive case (although 'indiscriminant' is unknown to the Urban dictionary). -- roundhouse0 (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops. Thanks. Fixed. --barneca (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's just a big list of names. I could make up 100 names out of thin air and stick them on there and no one would be the wiser. Seems pointless. -IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 23:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:IINFO.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 03:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.