Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Joe 03:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Kapust
Not notable, While the name Kapust is popular, the Kapust which this article is talking about which is Kapust Chassidic dynasty is not notable as any google search will show. PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  04:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

(Also, the nominator should not have placed this article for deletion while in the midst of an edit war with the author of this article. this seems like retaliation.)
 * Delete. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  04:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Historiclly it was notable. ems (not to be confused with the nonexistant pre-dating account by the same name) 05:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep oboviasly. Google is not the only method for determining notabilaty.
 * This group is historically notable. Its existence marked an important period in the history of Chabad Chassidism, as indicated in the article. Practically no reason to delete this article.--Meshulam 06:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I am withdrawing my nomination. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  13:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Does that mean we can take down the delete box?--Meshulam 15:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep withdrawn nomination. Fagstein 01:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.