Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kara Edwards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 02:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Kara Edwards
This individual may not meet WP:BIO or WP:NOTE, so rather than WP:PROD'ing it, I have nominated this at AFD. SunStar Net 08:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC) The "through conversation with Kara Edwards herself" refers only to the exact date of her wedding. If it makes any difference, I've removed it. Now the ONLY information on the page is from her official webpages or major metropolitan newspaper articles.DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC 19:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * In response to these notes by SunStar Net, I will now present my full disagreement to them for the Wikipedia Adminstration: Kara Edwards meets the following criteria from WP:NOTE Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions. Kara portrayed three major roles in the last third of Dragon Ball Z: Videl, Goten and Gotenks. A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following. Again, DBZ's fan base is large, even though it started out as a "cult" following. Kara also meets the following criteria from WP:Biographies of living persons Verifiability: All information in the article was gleaned from Kara's official webpages, major metropolitan newspaper articles, or through conversation with Kara Edwards herself. Neutral point of view: Although I am a fan of Kara's work, I did my best to make the page neutral. All biographical and career information was, again, provided by Kara Edwards herself with no embellishment; I had to add some "writing" to her resumé so that it would be more than just a bald list of her jobs, with no timeframe.  Some might disagree with my calling the "Tanner in the Morning" show "popular", but by virtue of ratings and community response, it WAS/IS popular; therefore, I feel this invalidates any claim of non-neutrality. I hold that any creation of a page that does not exist could be said to SUBJECTIVELY involve a certain amount of "original research", although this would really be closer to "fact gathering".  There was NO ORIGINAL REASEARCH involved in my creation of this page; everything on it(Kara's basic biographical information, her filmography, her broadcast career, details of her wedding) was a matter of public record.DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC 12:41, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment "through conversation with Kara Edwards herself" cannot be verified so any information of this nature should be deleted QuiteUnusual 17:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * "through conversation with Kara Edwards herself" &mdash; Interviewing the subject directly, firsthand, is original research. Uncle G 19:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep- Deletion? Really? It could be worked on, and deleting it is a bit too much wouldn't you say?-- S U  I  T Halloween? 05:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Voice actress of primary characters on internationally popular show. That's notable. --Marriedtofilm 06:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.