Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karam Dosa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Karam Dosa

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not have 2 reliable reviews. Since this is released during the Internet Age, Indiaglitz/nettv4u is not reliable.

Karam Dosa means spicy Dosa so please redirect there. , DareshMohan (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Actualcpscm (talk) 20:53, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 22:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 22:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The film has at least the 1 review on the page (123Telugu) and the one at Indiaglitz, mentioned by Daresh Mohan above, and Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_353 says Indiaglitz is not great but acceptable. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  08:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment That is a stretch. I don't think that was a wholesome discussion. Indiaglitz can be considered "ok" for pre-2010 films but not after that due to the availability of sources on the internet. The only sources found on the internet are  and  (mirchi9 is unreliable). A search of కరం దోస త్రివిక్రమ్ (Karam Dosa Trivikram) brings nothing. DareshMohan (talk) 22:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist, seems like we are stuck between a Keep and a Redirect to a completely different article subject. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment If this article were a draft, it would not pass AfC (articles for creation). A Google search shows that this is a food called Dosa and should be redirected there. DareshMohan (talk) 19:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Draftify or delete. The idea of redirecting to a food for a movie I personally think is VERY absurd and out of the ordinary. Anyways, I'm not seeing the GNG fulfilled yet. I think that one source is provided, but I would like to see more. If this is to be presumed to pass our notability guidelines, I think there is room to improve, but the article as a whole isn't ready.  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 16:53, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, sourcing is insufficient to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 12:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.