Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karan Doe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear cosensus  DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Karan Doe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable blogger who according to the article goes by the names Karan Doe and Karan Goyal, and according to the site he runs is actually called Karandeep Kumar. I can find no evidence of notability under any of these names. None of the provided refs is independent - most are to his own site Pollywood Reporter, the one other is to ArtistMag, which is also run by the subject. None of these sites appears to be notable either. The article was likely written by the subject himself - see the discussion on my talk page here. Fails WP:N and WP:V. BC108 (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 21:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 21:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Media-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 21:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)


 * delete no independent notability proofs. - üser:Altenmann >t 22:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable blogger. 64.134.64.190 (talk) 01:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. That user talk page discussion was kind of funny, and it seems to reinforce the promotional nature of this bio.  Without any independent coverage, this blogger fails to demonstrate notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not finding anything under any of the three listed names. Fails WP:BIO. /wiae   /tlk  01:34, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not yet better satisfying WP:CREATIVE.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.