Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karate punch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:00, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Karate punch
''Note: This AfD was originally created on April 13 by Angelstorm and was not listed. I am listing this now without a vote.'' -- Grev 05:43, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Can't really see the point in this article, basics of this are covered elsewhere. Writing style not in line with typical wikipedia quality. Contains unverified facts, and some non-npov comments. Angelstorm

Shimabuku's vertical punch was actually designed to hit at about three quarters of an arm's length's extension. It can be delivered at any range within this point, but it requires that the body-tensing be performed earlier, upon impact wherever it occurs. Timing is critical, unlike with the twisting punch, which thrusts through whatever it hits, if it is not jammed early. In either case the punch is not rising but horizontal. This article does make some unsubstantiated generalizations. I agree with some of them, others don't make much sense. Ultimaely, I have to agree with above. I'm not even sure why the entry for Karate punch should exist. In Karate, there are a number of punches, including straight punches, jabs, crossing punches, uppercusts, hooks, and descending punches. Perhaps there could be a section under punch in general, but I don't think there's such a thing as a Karate punch. It kind of reminds me of the Austin Powers Judo Chop. Erich1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.72.28.202 (talk • contribs)


 * Delete - per Erich1. Article is virtually unchanged since original, which smacks of WP:OR. I'm not even sure which of the many punch techniques this article is discussiong. Looking at Karate, it seems this was originally a section there that was disputed and then removed, so the author took it here. Jamoche 07:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Bucketsofg✐ 12:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete come on, what will we have next? Tae kwon do punch? M1ss1ontomars2k4 17:20, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR &mdash;M e ts501 talk 17:26, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above IrishGuy 19:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Newyorktimescrossword 02:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- ˑˑˑ 日 本 穣  Talk to Nihonjo  ε  23:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ˑˑˑ 日 本 穣 Talk to Nihonjo  ε  23:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No idea why I didn't actually list article in the first place :P --Angelstorm 08:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.