Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Beaman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:56, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Karen Beaman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable, as tagged since 2009 -- she's founded non-notable organizations and published in and received awards from them —Eustress talk 03:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. One of the possible criteria of notability listed at WP:AUTHOR is: "The person's work has won significant critical attention". I would say the professional awards she has won counts as significant critical attention. Add to that the significant collection of publications she has authored. Delete, see below Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 05:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, but all her publications and awards are tied to organizations she founded. How does that constitute "critical" attention"? —Eustress talk 07:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Good point well made. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 16:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. A Pulitzer or a Nobel would count as a significant award. What she got from an HR organization doesn't.  Sorry.  Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and none appear to be found in the search results.  Msnicki (talk) 16:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete this article is just a list of essays written by the this lady while at work.LuciferWildCat (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.