Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Fukuhara (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 06:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Karen Fukuhara
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Essentially a Repost of a userfied article with none of the reason for the original AfD (2 months before) decision being addressed. Still as per WP:TOOSOON and WP:UPANDCOMING. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:48, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing much addable to the article. Daniel Kenneth (talk) 18:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Verified principal role in a major release DC/Warner Bros. film. To say its too early to tell if this person will have major coverage is willful ignorance.  The essays, not guidelines, WP:TOOSOON and WP:UPANDCOMING are for unverified speculation and personal opinion as to the future potential of a person, not verified confirmation of her principle role which is already in post-production. --Oakshade (talk) 19:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Not willful ignorance - that was reflecting the opinion in the first AfD. Even after the movie comes out she would not meet WP:NACTOR (also as pointed out in the AfD 2 months ago).  Assuming coverage is WP:CRYSTALBALL.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * There will be zero question of her notability when the movie comes out. The only ones who would attempt to delete the article on her, which will be either still around or re-created, are the Wiki Lawyers who will hang on the word "multiple" in the sub-clause of a clause buried in WP:BIO as if that somehow will negate the barrage of coverage on this person on the approach of the release of that film. --Oakshade (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - She's on all the posters and marketing material for a film that could probably be one of the biggest super hero movies of the year. People will wonder why she doesn't have a Wiki page when the time comes.--Jonipoon (talk) 08:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Additions - With no surprise, since this AfD started there has been a great amount of new coverage of this person, internationally no less.  This is only the beginning.  The TOOSOON train has already left the station. --Oakshade (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep for now perhaps as this seems enough. My next alternative would've been to Redirect. SwisterTwister   talk  05:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.