Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Hill (television writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  01:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Karen Hill (television writer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article has been poorly sourced (either unsourced or solely sourced by IMDb since 2012. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television,  and Canada.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. A Canadian Comedy Award nomination would be a valid notability claim if the article were sourced properly, but it isn't "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass WP:GNG on her sourceability — but as soon as I was able to determine that this Karen Hill isn't Lawrence Hill's sister who died in 2014 and then had a posthumous novel published two years later, searching for "'Karen Hill' writer NOT Lawrence" got me precisely nowhere. Bearcat (talk) 17:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.