Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Liot Hill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Karen Liot Hill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails POLOUTCOMES and GNG. DarjeelingTea (talk) 02:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Poor references.Car4tea1 (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL as local councillor with no claim to notability. Also fails WP:BASIC. AusLondonder (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete members of city councils from cities with less than 15,000 people are virtually never notable. Actually I probably could say the same if it was a city with under 50,000, but clearly under 15,000.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Serving on the municipal council of a small city is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass — a town this size has no guarantee of even getting its mayor into Wikipedia, let alone a councillor — and the article is nowhere near well sourced enough to make a claim that she passes WP:GNG anyway. In addition, this is essentially a résumé, quite possibly copied and pasted from her own self-published campaign literature, rather than an encyclopedia article. Bearcat (talk) 18:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.