Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Paba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Essentially, the additional sources found by Michig were not challenged. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Karen Paba

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An advertorially-toned page on a nn individual. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Bkleinberg currently indef-blocked for abusing multiple accounts; likely UPE based on behavioural evidence. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HOTTIE Delete: Although she is mentioned in (mostly Spanish) press, subject comes accross as self-proclaimed expert with no concrete evidence to support this claim. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 10:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Whether or nor she is an expert isn't really the issue here, it has no bearing on satisfying WP:GNG. --Michig (talk) 13:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * What a stupid joke. This isn't beauty pageant. Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:06, 27 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Just stating 'non-notable X' as a deletion argument in every AfD isn't likely to carry much weight with closing administrators. --Michig (talk) 13:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Some decent coverage in multiple sources, makes this at least borderline for GNG, e.g., , . --Michig (talk) 13:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with Michig, and quite easily found the same sources and a few others - note that El Diario NY is a New York based Spanish-language news sources, so not local to her home country or place of business. This is another profile of her, focusing on her work with cancer patients:, in an English-language website about Latino entertainment and lifestyle. RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per above sources which indicate that WP:GNG is met. Assuming good faith that these sources are in RS and a prima facie look seems to support that. Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:03, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.