Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Wonders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Karen Wonders

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG. The only criteria under WP:NACADEMIC which they might meet is the 3rd bullet: "The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor..." However, I am not sure that the American College of Sports Medicine meets the criteria of a major scholarly society.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 04:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. It certainly does not, nor are any other categories of WP:Prof passed. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC).
 * Comment: some sources, although the first is written by the university communications department...I couldn't find any reviews of her 2 books. TJMSmith (talk) 05:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. A majority of the content is cited to primary sources (CV, journal articles by the subject). A handful of name drops and newspaper quotes do not adequately show that WP:GNG or any specific notability criterion such as WP:PROF is met. -- Kinu t/c 13:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment WorldCat came up empty when searching for the first of the two listed books (Exercise Programming for Cancer Patients, 2013). The second book (Pediatric Cancer Survivors, 2017) was a co-authored e-book published by IntechOpen, who appear to be a predatory publisher of the "you've got a document, we'll sell it as a book" variety. I don't think we're looking at a WP:AUTHOR pass. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.