Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kari sweets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Nufy8 03:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Kari Sweets
non-notable web "model". speedy tag removed by original author. Onorem 00:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete No claim of notability. --RMHED 01:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * We've had this fight before. Delete. - CheNuevara 01:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google search yields 590,000 Google hits. To my mind, that is an assertion of notability. By comparison, Pope Pius IX gets 658,000 --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Comparing the internet results for a current skin model with a pope that died 150 years ago really doesn't prove all that much. Argue the ~600k hits if you'd like, but don't bring Pius IX into it.  --Onorem 02:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I have to say, that's a real Truthbringer gem (tm) *applause* Bwithh 02:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Truthbringer is being a bit naive when it comes to Googling anything related to sex on the Internet. Every minor obscure porn starlet is bound to have well over 500K hits. Heck, get the pope to pose nude and I'm sure he'll go over the million mark. What sort of encyclopedic content do we really think this article can ever have? How can we possibly hope to ever build an article based on reliable sources for that woman? I'm not even sure we can find a single interview of her, let alone get basic info like her age, her real name, her city of residence. Pascal.Tesson 02:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Please tell me you didn't just use the terms "minor" and "porn starlet" in the same sentence... --Roninbk 07:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment who, what, me? you must have dreamt that. Please don't tell the cops. Pascal.Tesson 20:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom and Pascal Tesson. Urgggh... she's doesn't even do actual porn Bwithh 02:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * which might explain the low Ghits. :-)  Pascal.Tesson 02:17, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Notability (pornographic actors) Criteria:


 * '''"3. Performer has made unique, noteworthy contributions to his or her field.
 * Is the performer noted for beginning a trend in pornography?"''
 * ''Kari pioneered the trend of girls who came from social networking sites (she was huge on Xanga.com as a 15-17yr old) to creating her own successful paysite, without ever showing a glimpse of areola or vagina.
 * There has been no other internet paysite approaching her level of success without showing 1 or both of the previously mentioned body parts.''
 * 7. "Performer has been notable or prolific within a specific genre niche."
 * '' Kari is the most popular NonNude model online. She was also chosen the #1 favorite internet model out of hundreds of eligible girls (more popular then even the biggest porn girls), as voted for an entire year's
 * balloting at NNVote'' 05:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtdwiki (talk • contribs) 22:30, September 17, 2006
 * — Possible single purpose account: Mtdwiki (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * If these claims were made in the article, then maybe we'd have something. As it stands, the article makes NO claim of notability, and should be Speedied --Roninbk 07:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "without ever showing a glimpse of areola or vagina." um. yikes. Bwithh 02:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Just out of curiosity, that NN in NNVote doesn't stand for "not notable", does it? But I kid of course. I hate to break it to her fans but posing in suggestive poses, panties or no panties isn't exactly a new trend in pornography. Pascal.Tesson 03:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Just out of curiosity, that NN in NNVote doesn't stand for "not notable", does it? But I kid of course. I hate to break it to her fans but posing in suggestive poses, panties or no panties isn't exactly a new trend in pornography. Pascal.Tesson 03:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as nn per nom, and as failing WP:V per Pascal.Tesson. --Aaron 02:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep she is over 18 if you want to know more about her youtube has many interviews with her do not delete this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackjiggs (talk • contribs) 23:10, September 17, 2006
 * — Possible single purpose account: Blackjiggs (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Comment well you can't accuse of not doing my research: there are indeed some interviews on YouTube. I suggest this one as particularly informative . Quick, someone update the article, we now know that her favorite food besides garbage is mexican or italian and she always wanted a convertible with a license plate that says "DA BOMB"! Let's get serious here, we are writing an encyclopedia... Pascal.Tesson 03:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete advertising. --InShaneee 15:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't even come close to meeting the notability requirements of WP:BIO. -- Satori Son 15:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete subject does not meet WP:BIO guidelines.--Isotope23 20:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. She doesn't really meet WP:BIO. Also, just to further elaborate, the reason why models and porn stars bring up a big amount of Google hits is due to Googlebombing, which is what many webmasters due to bump up their websites up the page rank on Google. Also, her website apparently has an Alexa web traffic ranking of 18,167. For most sites, this would be considered high, but for a porn site, I think it's pretty low. Also, her website is apparently on the decline, which can be seen by the graph which shows that only half the number of people now access her website compared to 4 months ago. -- Nish kid 64 20:49, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * De-le-te spee-dy. Hahem : this is plain spam, adv. Need to have that long vfd ? Wow : maybe WP changed ? That's indeed a while I did not contribute. A purple wikiuser 21:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment you've just proved how much of a dinosaur you are by calling it VfD. That acronym is sooooo 2005. :-)  Pascal.Tesson 21:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yep :-) A purple wikiuser 22:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per several of the most recent comments. Marcus22 21:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, this is a non-notable "internet model" who has yet to accomplish anything significant. Yamaguchi先生 09:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP You people must be ignorant of the universe itself not to see how important Kari is. She is the first human being born to the pinnacle of perfection, for the sole purpose of displaying her amazing, gorgeous body. You all need to stop going to those Klingon meetings and RECOGNIZE lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.17.228.158 (talk)
 * Note to closing sysop: added by IP with 3 edits, all related to this AfD Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 08:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.