Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karielys Cuadros


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. S warm  we ♥ our hive  06:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Karielys Cuadros

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, participant in a non-notable pageants. Fails WP:BLPNOTE Flat Out (talk) 01:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  13:49, 15 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Nothing more to be said.--Rpclod (talk) 04:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks like in-depth coverage here, coupla paragraphs here, several photographs prominent here, a mention here, another mention here, a paragraph here, another mention here, several photos in this article here, and in-depth coverage here. That said, the article (if it stays) should be only a short paragraph long, if that. Beauty contests are a big deal in Latin American countries such as Venezuela, there is coverage to meet the WP:GNG, but let's keep it short.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG, see the sources in the previous post, there seems to have been some controversy about her not wiining the pageant what triggered more coverage than usual of a runner-up. See also this, this (spells "Cuadro" without s), this, this and so on... Kraxler (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.