Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karima Francis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 02:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Karima Francis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Although mentioned in several local music columns, does not appear to meet the criteria for notability. Specifically, she has not had a single or album on any country's national music chart; has not had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country; has not received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country; has not released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels;]] nor has met other criteria in [] Wkharrisjr (talk) 15:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Coverage in the Daily Mail and the Observer can scarcely be considered "local music columns" for a resident of Manchester. That she hasn't met WP:MUSIC may be the case, but that's subordinate to the GNG.   Ravenswing  17:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - The sources supplied do not  add up  to  'significant ' coverage even broadly  construed. A flash-in-the-pan or an upcoming  artist. Wait  until the criteria per nom have been fulfilled. --Kudpung (talk) 03:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Has enough coverage for WP:N (I have updated the article and there is still more coverage available). duffbeerforme (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Plenty of coverage found from a Google News search. Clearly notable.--Michig (talk) 07:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.