Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karina Bagration-Moukhransky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 09:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Karina Bagration-Moukhransky

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Karina Bagration-Moukhransky is an artist, model and a networker, and a Polish princess who aims to save the world. Maybe?

There's no references here, and while Google throws up a bit, there's really no reliable material from which to write a biography. I don't this is a hoax, but I do ask -1) is she notable or just a self-promoter. 2) are there any reliable sources from which to write a bio? Scott Mac (Doc) 12:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-promotion, but there are some mitigating factors. Current news coverage for Ms. Bagration-Moukhransky appears to focus on ASmallWorld (which itself may not be notable) and the accounts which have created this page also have contributed to that one. This would appear to be an act of self-promotion and so the article should be deleted. However, I suspect that Ms. Bagration-Moukhransky may satisfy our notability criteria if solid sourcing of her heritage can be discovered, and if she is permitted to be styled as a princess, etc. I find her listed that way in the Hollywood Examiner and some other sites and so it looks legit, but those sites (even the Examiner) may not be reliable enough that I would trust them to be sure unless there were a full bio article done about her, which I have been unable to find. So, delete for now, but recreate if reliable sources can be found and if someone can make this sound less like a promotion. JRP (talk) 14:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-promotion with no independant sources at best. Edward321 (talk) 22:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, appears to just be self-promotional, and I couldn't find anything independent on this person, although I do note that User:Jrp is right in that she might have a better claim to notability if some of the claims she makes about herself could be sourced. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete I'm always wary when I google something and the first thing that comes up is its Wikipedia entry. And the next 3 are other websites that contain the wikipedia entry. I sometimes wonder how many pages of Google results we're meant to look through to try and find something, then I stop thinking that and think "delete it" Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 02:06, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.