Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karina Brez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 23:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Karina Brez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMODEL, fails WP:BLP1E, poorly sourced (routine local "girl wins something type coverage") and part of a mass creation of articles on pageant participents by a SOCK farm link and junk building effort. Legacypac (talk) 10:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC) Legacypac (talk) 11:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * comment after I closed the group afd on the basis of likely unequal notability, I advised renominating individually a few at a time; renominating in very large groups the way these are being done is not a good idea, because it defeats the purpose of letting people have time to look for individual sources. (personally, though,  I think sufficient sources are likely to be found only when there is  a substantial subsequent career).  DGG ( talk ) 16:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep I have updated this article to include two controversies the subject was involved in, one at Miss Florida pageant and one at Miss USA contest. There are references now from two local newspapers, one national paper, NyDailyNews, and CBS.com, as well as international coverage from DailyMail in UK. these references across numerous reliable verifiable sources more than denote Notability and well as have the article subject pass WP:GNG    WordSeventeen (talk) 04:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think we want to make every winner of a state Miss USA title notable. The second controversy issue actually makes this article weaker, being poorly written and gossipy.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:24, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 06:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not every pagent winner is notable and this is another fine example - Can't find any shred of notability so Fails GNG/ – Davey 2010 Talk 17:52, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep the sourcing in the article (7 sources, all reliable and independent of the subject) is sufficient to establish notability under a normal interpretation of the GNG. It is the burden of anyone wishing to argue otherwise to state why the sources don't meet the criteria. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as improved article easily crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds of WP:GNG. - Dravecky (talk) 16:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:GNG with multiple citations in reliable, third-party sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 23:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.