Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karina Kay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. reclosing after enquiry. I missed that awards had been added and subsequent votes were to keep. Spartaz Humbug! 09:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Karina Kay

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to fail WP:PORNBIO. VG &#x260E; 11:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails all the basic criteria. Deb (talk) 11:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:PORNBIO.--Regents Park (sniff out my socks) 13:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 23:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete' - no evidence of notability at all. Tabercil (talk) 23:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails PORN BIO and lacks notability. JBsupreme (talk) 08:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep She passes WP:BIO/WP:PORNBIO due to her award nominations. Note to closing admin: the award nominations were added to the article after the first three votes here were made. Epbr123 (talk) 10:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:PORNBIO. Tatarian (talk) 17:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep she technically passes WP:Pornbio due to the award nominations, but they are both group (3+) scene nominations which is as weak as it gets for awards. Also that's literally the only content in the article. 0 usable xbiz, avn, or gnews returns. Karina Kay interview on google similarly yields nothing of worth. I'm a staunch defender of the criteria, but this is a nearly useless article with little hope of improvement.Horrorshowj (talk) 02:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Excellent example of why I think the PORNBIO criteria is flawed since it should only be winners that are notable. Jack Napier is a hell of a lot more notable in the porn world than her but it looks like his article is going to go down in flames. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:08, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.