Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karissa Schweizer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mostly a case of WP:TOOSOON. Could be restored at some point in the future if better sources appear. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Karissa Schweizer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unremarkable athlete does not come anywhere near to close to criteria WP:NTRACK Domdeparis (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nom, doesn't meet WP:NTRACK, nor does she meet WP:NCOLLATH.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Added sources to Kansas City Star (2 articles), Runner's World, and FloTrack. Multiple independent significant articles in three different reliable sources as well as current holder of national-level title qualifies under both WP:GNG and WP:NTRACK. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the one Keep vote listed offers sources but they are not convincing and in fact mirror the deletion, therefore delete since she's only a college player. SwisterTwister   talk  00:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment It is true that Schweizer does not meet NTRACK; but since she's an individual NCAA cross-country champion, saying "she does not come anywhere near to close" to meeting it is quite a stretch. It's not clear to me whether she meets GNG, and accordingly I have no opinion on whether to delete or keep; Eggishorn has done good work adding sources. Sideways713 (talk) 01:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 13:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment at the time of my comment there was nothing about her being NCAA champion or being voted NCAA D1 Athlete of the year and as such came nowhere near the NTRACK criteria. She may now meet the GNG criteria but it might also be a case of WP:TOOSOON as the NCAA is a collegiate association and she still has a long way to go before meeting one of the different criteria. She has yet to compete in a senior championship or an international event. Domdeparis (talk) 15:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I admit I haven't been able to find more coverage that would be worth adding to this article. While this level of improvement clearly falls short of the  WP:HEYMANN standard, I think that she pases both WP:GNG and WP:1E+, if perhaps only just. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.