Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl-Erik Forsberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Karl-Erik Forsberg

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete per WP:N and WP:BURDEN. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk) 05:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I expanded the article. – Eastmain (talk) 05:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Forsberg was a very well-known type designer and several good off-line sources exist. The article there now is a new one entirely by Eastmain. The nomination concerned a useless one-liner, and I assume it will be withdrawn at this point. --Hegvald (talk) 05:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Long-time artistic leader of two major Swedish publishers and the creator of many high-profile logos. Tomas e (talk) 14:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The 621 books referring to the subject found by simply clicking on the word "books" above give a clue as to the notability of the subject. Is it really too much to ask deletion nominators to spend a few seconds doing such basic searches before putting the time-wasting burden of defending the existence of articles about obviously notable subjects onto other editors? Aren't we all supposed to be here to try to improve the encyclopedia rather than pass judgement on whether others have jumped through the right hoops in creating articles? Phil Bridger (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.