Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KarlSchererRevisited5

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Sorry but it's still no consensus. Woohookitty 07:40, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

Transport puzzle
Sorry about this, but Votes for deletion/MoreKarlScherer ended with no consensus, due to many people voting to keep simply because they didn't want to vote on all the articles listed at once, so now they are listed seperately. This is the VfD for
 * Transport puzzle

For the reason to delete this article, see Votes for deletion/MoreKarlScherer


 * Delete     00:49, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I can see no good reason to delete it james gibbon  01:02, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the top hits are Wikipedia and mirrors, making this a neologism and/or original research. Niteowlneils 01:20, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, it wasn't started by karl, but it's still an odd and unneccisary article. Slike2 01:58, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, at least. -- BD2412 talk 03:15, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Mechanical puzzle. JamesBurns 09:36, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Niteowlneils -Harmil 15:46, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand: this is a valid class of games (includes checkers, chess, and many other lesser known games). It is a nice starting stub, and a good place to branch off from. I see no good reason to delete. --Bambaiah 11:01, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't understand why this is even an issue, and why people who don't contribute to any math articles feel its socially acceptable to VfD math articles. linas 15:20, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as I see absolutly no reason to delete this. --R.Koot 16:03, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable enough for me. Paul August &#9742; 17:33, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Stop listing these things for deletion and take up merge/redirect issues at WikiProject Games instead. - dcljr (talk) 21:18, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand Laura Scudder | Talk 23:20, 20 July 2005 (UTC)


 * keep Count Iblis 00:26, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * user has 60 prior edits     21:27, 21 July 2005 (UTC)


 * I have a large number of edits from the time before I made my user account. I have started a number of high quality scientific pages here. Quality (i.e. starting or contributing to high quality pages) not quantity (chatting on talk pages) should count. Count Iblis 22:01, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Then sign here when logged out, so that it proves your statement that you are the same as the IP that made those edits.     13:02, 23 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep expand and reference;nice subject Salsb 01:47, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this description of a popular class of puzzles. Karol 06:25, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't seem to be a good name, and considering the content of the article, there are already tour puzzle and river crossing puzzle, and the remaining ones would be better characterized by the principle of finite amount of states that you can change by some rules (like chess puzzle).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.