Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Strauss Brewing Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. — xDanielx  T/C\R 09:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Karl Strauss Brewing Company

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is a corporate timeline and there's no evidence from RS coverage that its a notable company. Ghits confirm its existence but there's nothing to establish notability there either. Appears to be an active brewery but nothing that sets it apart per WP:CORP. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 15:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * A Pint of Keep A Google search of "Karl Strauss Brewing" (sans the "Company") turns up some more coverage: . The article needs referencing, of course, but I think notability can be confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, albeit weakly. This is a brick and mortar business selling consumer goods, and as such, as Ecoleetage has shown, non-trade third party sources exist and could be added for it. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: There seems to be some technical glitch with this AfD. The link to the AfD discussion at the article's page is still red-linked even though the AfD discussion page exists. I could not quite understand what the problem is. Nsk92 (talk) 14:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, just seems to need references and a little work on the content as well.--Chef Tanner (talk) 16:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment it exists, I'm not doubting that but I'm not seeing any evidence it passes WP:CORP. What am I missing? TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 19:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable." This looks more like an ad for beer than history. --Edie777 (talk) 20:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.