Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Wilkes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete - does not meet WP:BIO standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 11:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Karl Wilkes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced BLP for which I can't find any reliable independent sources, fails WP:ARTIST. Contested prod. – Hysteria18 (Talk • Contributions) 19:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unreferenced, seemingly unnotable, article written in a completely unencyclopaedic style. More promotion than encyclopaedia article. That's before the conflict of interest comes in. Canterbury Tail   talk  14:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. JNW (talk) 14:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

talk
 * KEEP-None of the information presented on the page is for promotional use-- it is merely factual. Mr. Wilkes' works are notable and have won several awards.  Let more edits be done to the page before deleting it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwilkesgallery (talk • contribs) 14:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: while it may not have been your intention to be promotional, that is how it reads - see WP:SPAM. There also appear to COI and spamname problems too.


 * Strong delete Unreferenced, unencyclopedic, COI-ridden spamfest ukexpat (talk) 14:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom.Deadchildstar (talk) 15:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.