Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karlatornet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Firm consensus that there is plenty of sourcing to satisfy notability, which between that and the Swedish Wiki article could allow for significant article enhancement is any editor so chooses (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 20:28, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Karlatornet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's a very short article which it clearly does not meet the WP:GNG, plus it is unsourced. Sheldybett (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. Someone with the requisite language skills should check out the equivalent Swedish Wikipedia article. This might help identify new sources. BenKuykendall (talk) 03:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article is in a sorry state, but the building meets WP:GNG. A quick WP:BEFORE would have shown that there is significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources and when completed the building will be the highest in the Nordic countries. To show the variety of sources: . Sjö (talk) 06:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Per, who found many sources, and there are innumerable others as well, none of which, it seems, are in English. We don't limit ourself to sources in any one language, which is why this AfD is yet another example of WP:BIAS. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment, as this wont be finished for a few years i was concerned that the numerous available sources may have been routine/PR and it may have been WP:TOOSOON, even then i would have thought a redirect to Gothenburg or the architects (Skidmore, Owings & Merrill) would have been appropriate, i am now assured by above that they arent, so this is a keep from me as meeting WP:GNG. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Göteborgs-Posten, which is the source in many of the links given by Sjö above references in the Swedish article, is the leading newspaper in western Sweden. This has plenty of non-routine coverage – for good reason. I have added at least one of the articles as a reference in the article. /Julle (talk) 01:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets notability as demonstrated by User:Sjö. --1l2l3k (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above. --Doncram (talk) 06:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources brought by Sjö.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.